Prince Harry was just in the United Kingdom for a court hearing about his security, and arrived mere days after the London wedding of his close friend, Lord Charles Vivian. And naturally inquiring minds want to know why Harry didn't move his trip up by a few days to attend. Especially after the Daily Mail stirred up drama by asking Lord Vivian directly why the Duke of Sussex wasn't there, to which he responded with a supremely awkward "I don't know. He has a lot on."
Sooo, why did Harry skip his friend's major life moment? According to an insider who spoke to the Daily Mail, the royal simply felt the “risk level was too high.” Per a source, "security wasn't provided for the visit, which makes attending events or moving around the UK very challenging."
Meanwhile, Prince Harry also didn't see his father, King Charles, during the trip—despite reportedly overlapping in London for several hours before His Majesty left to Italy. Per The Sun, "it is believed the pair have now not seen each other in person for 14 months."
It's unknown if Harry saw his brother, Prince William, during his trip to London, but he and Kate Middleton were spotted skiing in the French Alps with their kids earlier this month, so it seems likely that they weren't around. Plus, there's the fact that William and Harry are locked in a never ending feud which you can read about...
